Search This Blog

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Virtual source position for electrons

Today the concept of virtual source position for electrons came up.

I looked it up on my blog and had posted from an unknown reference a few years ago and never included the information.

8.1.3. Inverse square law (virtual source position)
In contrast to a photon beam, which has a distinct focus located at the
accelerator X ray target, an electron beam appears to originate from a point in
space that does not coincide with the scattering foil or the accelerator exit
window. The term ‘virtual source position’ was introduced to indicate the
virtual location of the electron source.

The effective source to surface distance (SSD) for electron beams
(SSDeff) is defined as the distance from the virtual source position to the point
of the nominal SSD (usually the isocentre of the linac). The inverse square law
may be used for small SSD differences from the nominal SSD to make
corrections to the absorbed dose for variations in air gaps between the patient
surface and the applicator.

There are various methods to determine the SSDeff. One commonly used
method consists of measuring the dose at various distances from the electron
applicator by varying the gap between the phantom surface and the applicator
(with gaps ranging from 0 to 15 cm). In this method, doses are measured in a
phantom at the depth of maximum dose zmax, with the phantom first in contact
with the applicator (zero gap) and then at various distances g from the
applicator. Suppose I0 is the dose with zero gap (g = 0) and Ig is the dose with
gap distance g. It follows then from the inverse square law that:

Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics

Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics Member of the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics (EFOMP) and the International Organization for Medical Physics (IOMP) Quality Control of Medical Electron Accelerators
 http://www.sgsmp.ch/r11qca-e.pdf

Book in the works

I haven't posted much to this blog in a few years, it was originally hosted at medicalphysicsinfo.blogspot.com I have recently migrated it to my personal blog.

Last year I discussed with the friend the idea of writing an interesting book related to my career and some of the pioneers responsible for the equipment. It is in the research stage, but I hope to publish some excerpts from it as they become available. I am still very busy clinically so work on this project, is accomplished sporadically. While much of this blog may discuss my career, it is certain to also feature my other interests including music and exercise. As you can see I already posted one of my favorite training methods for running your best mile.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Jeff galloway mile method

http://www.jeffgalloway.com/resources/rw_archives/may_1999.html

I used this method to reach some running related goals. Will utilize this again especially once warmer weather affords me the use of an outdoor track. In the meantime 400 meter repeats at high speed on a treadmill seem to be in my near future

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

AAPM Videos

I will be reviewing videos off the AAPM website and summarize some key facts.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Prostate IMRT

RMH

Rectum

Dose Vol%
75 Gy 7
70 Gy 12
65 Gy 17
60 Gy 25
50 Gy 35

Bladder

Dose Vol%
80 Gy 7
75 Gy 12
70 Gy 17
65 Gy 25

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Desirable chamber characteristics

D. Desirable Chamber Characteristics
A practical ion chamber for exposure measurement should have the following characteristics:
1)
There should be minimal variation in sensitivity or exposure calibration factor over a wide range of photon energies.

2)
There should be suitable volume to allow measurements for the expected range of exposures. The sensitivity (charge measured per roentgen) is directly proportional to the chamber-sensitive volume. For example, the reading obtained for a given exposure with a 30-cm3 chamber will be approximately 50 times higher than that obtained with a 0.6-cm3 chamber. However, the ratio may not be exactly 50, because a chamber response also depends on the chamber design, as discussed previously.

3)
There should be minimal variation in sensitivity with the direction of incident radiation. Although this kind of variation can be minimized in the design of the chamber, care is taken to use the chamber in the same configuration with respect to the beam as specified under chamber calibration conditions.

4)
There should be minimal stem “leakage.” A chamber is known to have stem leakage if it records ionization produced anywhere other than its sensitive volume. The problem of stem leakage is discussed later in this chapter.

5)
The chamber should have been calibrated for exposure against a standard instrument for all radiation qualities of interest.

6)
There should be minimal ion recombination losses. If the chamber voltage is not high enough or regions of low electric field strength occur inside the chamber, such as in the vicinity of sharply concave surfaces or corners, ions may recombine before contributing to the measured charge. The problem becomes severe with high-intensity or pulsed beams.

Khan 4th ed

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Radiation Safety list server

radlab.nl/radsafe/archives/9802/msg00510.html

This looks like a radiation safety list server.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Magnetron current

Reference: Elekta manual

If the current of the magnetron magnet is reduced, the magnetron impedance will also be reduced, the HT current will increase, but the RF power will go down because the effective voltage is reduced.

V=IR
I decreases, V decreases

P=IV
if V decreases Power decreases

Monday, March 23, 2009

Procedures

TSET- Stanford Technique
TBI- With different lung blocking protocols
HDR ring and tandem
HDR vaginal cylinder
HDR Mammosite
LDR Tandem and Ovoid
LDR Ir-192 interstitial (shoulder, neck, other locations)
LDR Eye plaque (ocular melanoma)
LDR Brain lesions with I-125
Stereotactic Radiosurgery with cones, MMLC
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for AVM

Monday, December 29, 2008

Varian OBI (kV)

Specs on kV imaging system

Varian G242 tube
14 degree anode
.4 and .8 mm focal spot

kvD amorphous silicon detector

Layer is 1.8 cm below the scatter grid
40x30 cm panel at isocenter

the kV arms are defined by anatomy, shoulder, arm etc
Defaults for the arms are 100 cm source to isocenter, 50 for the panel

kVp maxes out at 140, says it goes up to 150 but really 140.

OUT is out of the way, retract is fully retracted. But to access cabinets has to be OUT but not fully retracted (back).